Rohm and Haas Co. v. Lin
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
SHOGAN, J.:
¶ 1 In these consolidated appeals, Dr. Manhua Lin (“Dr. Lin”) and EverNu Technology LLC (“EverNu”) appeal from the order entering a default judgment and a permanent injunction in favor of Dr. Lin’s former employer, Rohm and Haas Company (“Rohm and Haas”), as a discovery sanction against Dr. Lin. After careful review, we affirm in part, vacate in part and remand for further proceedings consistent with this Opinion. We quash Ever-Nu’s appeal. 1
¶ 2 A previous panel of this Court set forth the factual and procedural history of this case as follows:
In the present case, the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Strickland v. University of ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Thunberg v. StrauseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Berkeyheiser v. A-Plus Investigations, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Croydon Plastics Co. v. Lower Bucks Cooling & HeatingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. BotticellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- In re Bridgeport Fire LitigationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- ANTHONY BIDDLE CONTRACTORS, INC. v. Preet Allied American Street, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Branham v. Rohm and Haas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Grimes v. Enterprise Leasing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.