Legal Opinion

McKenna v. Sosso

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 3, 1999PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 Helen V. Sosso and Ronald F. Crou-shore appeal the trial court’s decree confirming a common law arbitration award and entering judgment in favor of Kathy McKenna. Sosso and Croushore contend that the trial court erred in confirming the judgment because the arbitration panel failed to provide a full and fair hearing of their defenses prior to entering an award and relied on evidence outside the record. We conclude that the arbitration panel provided a full and fair hearing to all parties. Moreover, the record fails to substantiate the irregularities in the arbitration process…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Teamsters Local 312 v. Matlack, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Keystone Building Corp. v. Lincoln Savings and Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Smaligo v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Chervenak, Keane & Co. v. Hotel Rittenhouse Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. SteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Trombetta v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. U.S. Claims, Inc. v. DoughertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. F.J. Busse Co. v. Sheila Zipporah, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Gargano v. Terminix International Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Allegheny County v. Golf Resort, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API