Legal Opinion

Thunberg v. Strause

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 1996PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CASTILLE, Justice.

The two related issues presented in this case are: (1) whether the trial court abused its discretion when it awarded reasonable counsel fees and costs against appellee Thunberg for filing a negligence action against the estate of the person killed by Thunberg’s automobile while it sped uncontrollably in a westward direction in the eastbound lanes of a four-lane highway and (2) whether additional counsel fees and costs may be awarded for the appellate litigation of the trial court’s granting of fees against appellee. For the reasons set forth below, we…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. McNair's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. J.H. France Refractories Co. v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Smith v. Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. Hart v. ArnoldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Lachat v. HinchliffeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Rohm and Haas Co. v. LinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. James Corp. v. North Allegheny School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Lucchino v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API