Legal Opinion

Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Stein

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1996No. 3700PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

This is an appeal from an October 2, 1995 order denying appellant Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company’s petition to vacate an arbitration award. Appellant presents the following issues for our review:

I. Whether the Lower Court should have vacated the Award of Arbitrators based upon the Award being unjust, conscience [sic] and against public policy.

II. Whether or not [appellee] was an insured under his Prudential policy of insurance.

III. Whether or not the policy language excluding coverage to [appellee] was clear and unambiguous and in accordance with current…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hall v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Runewicz v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Azpell v. Old Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Hall v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Dearry v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. U.S. Claims, Inc. v. DoughertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Sage v. GreenspanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. McKenna v. SossoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Gargano v. Terminix International Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Hartford Insurance v. O'MaraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API