Legal Opinion

Chervenak, Keane & Co. v. Hotel Rittenhouse Associates, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 1984No. 146PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant challenges the lower court’s affirmance of an arbitration panel’s award in favor of appellee. We hold that the court, finding no violation of the arbitration procedure, correctly confirmed the award and entered judgment. Accordingly, we affirm the order entered below.

On June 12, 1979, appellant, Hotel Rittenhouse Associates (HRA), and appellee, Chervenak, Keane and Co. (CKC), entered into a contract whereby appellee was to provide advisory services in certain technical support areas incident to the construction and pre-opening of appellant’s hotel-condominium.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. FioravantiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Runewicz v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Harwitz v. Selas Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Smaligo v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Smith v. DaleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. McKenna v. SossoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. F.J. Busse Co. v. Sheila Zipporah, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Gargano v. Terminix International Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Snyder v. CressSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. BRIDGES PBT v. ChattaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API