Trombetta v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
TAMILIA, J.:
¶ 1 James Trombetta and his daughters Tara Trombetta Witover and Julie Trom-betta Gray appeal from the March 4, 2005 Order denying appellants’ request for de novo review of an unfavorable decision rendered by a three-member National Association of Securities Dealers arbitration panel (“NASD arbitration panel”).
¶2 Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Peter Gialames, and Edward Lewis cross-appeal from the Order ruling that the parties were governed by a de novo review arbitration clause in an agreement between the parties.1
¶ 3 In May of…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Nafta Traders, Inc. v. QuinnTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
- Southwestern Energy Production Co. v. Forest Resources, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Taylor v. Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.