Legal Opinion

Trombetta v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 2006PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

TAMILIA, J.:

¶ 1 James Trombetta and his daughters Tara Trombetta Witover and Julie Trom-betta Gray appeal from the March 4, 2005 Order denying appellants’ request for de novo review of an unfavorable decision rendered by a three-member National Association of Securities Dealers arbitration panel (“NASD arbitration panel”).

¶2 Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Peter Gialames, and Edward Lewis cross-appeal from the Order ruling that the parties were governed by a de novo review arbitration clause in an agreement between the parties.1

¶ 3 In May of…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Nafta Traders, Inc. v. QuinnTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Cable Connection, Inc. v. DirecTV, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Southwestern Energy Production Co. v. Forest Resources, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Taylor v. Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API