Legal Opinion

Swarthout v. Gentry

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 1943No. Civ. 3242PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory judgment providing for the appointment of referees to partition real property and striking a balance on an accounting between partners.

In his complaint plaintiff alleges that real estate in San Bernardino County and certain desert water holes were owned by himself and defendant as tenants in common and sought a partition of the property. Defendant denied that the property was held by the parties as tenants in common, alleging it was owned by a partnership composed of plaintiff and defendant operating under the name Gentry and Swarthout. By way of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bates v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Koyer v. WillmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. McConnell v. Bible InstituteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Jameson v. HaywardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Perelli-Minetti v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Heck v. HeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Hooper v. BarrantiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Prince v. HartingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Cochran v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Schoeller v. SchoellerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API