Jameson v. Hayward
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action for the partition of three fifty-vara water lots in the city and county of San Francisco.
The court found that the plaintiff was the owner of an undivided tenth of an estate for years, viz., an estate for ninety-nine years, from March 16, 1851, iu and to two of the three lots; that defendant George Brown is the owner of an undivided tenth interest of an estate for years, viz., an estate for ninety-nine years, in the third lot; that the defendant Alvinza Hayward is the owner of the remaining nine-tenths of said estate for ninety-nine years in all of the three lots,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Watson v. Dundee Mortgage & Trust Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1885
- De Uprey v. De UpreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Rumpp v. GerkensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Fowler v. FayIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
- Bailey v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Canavin v. Pacific Southwest AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- United States v. 70.39 Acres of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
- De Roulet v. MitchelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Chrisman v. LindermanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.