Heck v. Heck
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from an interlocutory judgment in a divorce action in which it was decreed that Rose Heck, whom we will refer to as the defendant, was entitled to a divorce from O. O. Heck on the ground of extreme cruelty, and dividing the community property of those parties, awarding her $5,800 additional attorneys’ fees and $686.97 additional auditor’s fees.
Plaintiff concedes that the evidence was sufficient to support the judgment for divorce and no question is raised on this phase of the case. He attacks the portion of the decree dividing the community property and awarding the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rickards v. NoonanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Farrar v. FarrarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Swarthout v. GentryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Busch v. BuschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Estate of NeilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Deyoe v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
- Kenney v. KenneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Raphael v. RaphaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Wind v. HerbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.