Perelli-Minetti v. Lawson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Upon the very earnest insistence of appellants that the decision of this case by the district court of appeal, affirming the judgment of the trial court, did not correctly state the law and had done an injustice to the appellants, a hearing was granted by this court to enable it to carefully study the record upon appeal and the contentions of the parties with reference- thereto. After careful consideration, we are satisfied with the decision of the district court of appeal of the state of California, in and for the third appellate district, and hereby adopt the opinion of said…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roberts v. WehmeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Koyer v. WillmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Johnson v. HoganMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Cooley v. Miller & Lux, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Musick Consolidated Oil Co. v. ChandlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- City of Stockton v. EllingwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Wrightson v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Swanson v. SiemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Bastjan v. BastjanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Swarthout v. GentryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.