Hooper v. Barranti
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
OGDEN, J. pro tem.
Fred E. Hooper was the sole owner and operator of an on-sale retail liquor tavern business under a license issued in his name. He entered into a verbal agreement, confirmed shortly thereafter by a written agreement, of association with Joseph P. Barranti whereby they agreed to become equal partners in the operation of the business. Barranti agreed to pay to Hooper the sum of $1,500 for a one-half interest in the business at the rate of $100 per month. It was agreed that the on-sale liquor license, under which the business had been operated by Hooper and under which it was to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Wise v. RadisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Chateau v. SinglaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Denning v. TaberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Shunken v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Hastings Associates, Inc. v. Local 369 Building Fund, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Magill v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1958
- Prince v. HartingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.