Legal Opinion

Prince v. Harting

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 1960No. Civ. 18383PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuniway, J.

In this action for dissolution of two partnerships, an accounting and damages designated as “secret profits,” plaintiffs had judgment and defendant appeals. He does not claim that the evidence does not support the findings. His complaints are that the findings do not support the judgment in certain respects and that in any event the money judgment entered against him is improper because, as yet, the final balance has not been determined in the partnership accounting.

The Facts Found

An understanding of appellant’s points requires that we set out the principal facts found by the court,…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Crogan v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,249 Homer E. Stephenson and Freda Lois Stephenson, His Wife v. Calpine Conifers Ii, Ltd., a Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. People v. SobiekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. In Re Granite Partners, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API