Legal Opinion
Koes v. Advanced Design, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 4, 2001No. C8-01-715PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
This matter was originally heard in conciliation court, resulting in judgment in favor of respondent-homeowners. At the trial following removal to the district court, the district court initially directed a verdict in favor of appellant-homebuilder. Immediately thereafter, the district court vacated the directed verdict, received further testimony, finished the trial, and dismissed respondents’ claim. On August 4, 2000, respondents moved for a new trial, or, in the alternative, for relief from the judgment under Minn. R. Civ. P. 60.02(a) and (f). An amended…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Dahlin v. KroeningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Brink v. Smith Companies Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Gomez v. David A. Williams Realty & Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.