Legal Opinion

Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 6, 1988No. C3-87-419, C2-87-511PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

This products liability case raises a variety of issues, including interpretation of the statutory “useful life defense,” the duty to warn, and entitlement to punitive damages. Issues on allocation of a tort recovery between the injured employee and subrogated employer, as well as on prejudgment interest, are also presented. We affirm, for the most part, except for a reduction in punitive damages and a remand for reallocation of the tort recovery and readjustment of interest.

*829On December 19, 1981, plaintiff Dale Hodder, age 17, was seriously injured when the metal rim of a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Comstock v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Gryc Ex Rel. Gryc v. Dayton-Hudson Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Naig v. Bloomington SanitationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Dunn v. HOVICCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. Jill Nesladek, as Trustee for Heirs and Next of Kin of Jeremy J. Nesladek, Decedent v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. Niccum v. Hydra Tool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Patton v. Hutchinson Wil-Rich Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API