Gomez v. David A. Williams Realty & Construction, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge.
Appellants challenge the grant of summary judgment to respondents dismissing new-home warranty claims as barred by the statute of repose contained in Minn. Stat. § 541.051, subd. 1(a) (2004). Appellants argue that the district court (1) erred by considering the statute-of-repose defense asserted for the first time in respondent builder’s reply brief; (2) used the wrong event to trigger accrual of their warranty cause of action; and (3) erroneously concluded that their cause of action accrued more than ten years after the warranty date. We affirm the district court’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Monson v. Rochester Athlectic ClubCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Vill. Lofts At St. Anthony Falls Ass'n v. Hous. Partners Iii-Lofts LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019