Legal Opinion

Gomez v. David A. Williams Realty & Construction, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 6, 2007No. A06-2155PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

Appellants challenge the grant of summary judgment to respondents dismissing new-home warranty claims as barred by the statute of repose contained in Minn. Stat. § 541.051, subd. 1(a) (2004). Appellants argue that the district court (1) erred by considering the statute-of-repose defense asserted for the first time in respondent builder’s reply brief; (2) used the wrong event to trigger accrual of their warranty cause of action; and (3) erroneously concluded that their cause of action accrued more than ten years after the warranty date. We affirm the district court’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Monson v. Rochester Athlectic ClubCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  2. Vill. Lofts At St. Anthony Falls Ass'n v. Hous. Partners Iii-Lofts LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API