Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge. *
This appeal requires judicial interpretation of the statute of repose for claims premised on defective and unsafe real estate improvements. Appellant contends the ten-year statute (running from the date when construction is completed), because it limits when an action can “accrue,” permits suits within the normal two-year limitation period in the eleventh or twelfth year after construction is completed, even though its claim accrued in fact after the ten-year anniversary. Determining that a proper interpretation of the statute requires this result, we reverse the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Sartori v. Harnischfeger Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Calder v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Kittson County v. Wells, Denbrook & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Brink v. Smith Companies Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006