Legal Opinion

Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 12, 2005No. A04-1251PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge. *

This appeal requires judicial interpretation of the statute of repose for claims premised on defective and unsafe real estate improvements. Appellant contends the ten-year statute (running from the date when construction is completed), because it limits when an action can “accrue,” permits suits within the normal two-year limitation period in the eleventh or twelfth year after construction is completed, even though its claim accrued in fact after the ten-year anniversary. Determining that a proper interpretation of the statute requires this result, we reverse the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Sartori v. Harnischfeger Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Calder v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Kittson County v. Wells, Denbrook & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Brink v. Smith Companies Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  3. Weston v. McWilliams & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API