Legal Opinion
Hoang Minh Ly v. Nystrom
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 3, 2000No. C6-99-565PublishedCited by 161 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINGER, Justice.
During negotiations between appellant Hoang Minh Ly and respondent Kim Nys-trom for the purchase of respondent’s restaurant, respondent made misrepresentations to appellant relating to monthly profits and the condition of the restaurant and its inventory. The restaurant never made a profit and discussion between the parties led to a contract cancellation. Appellant then brought suit alleging common law fraud and a violation of Minnesota’s Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), Minn.Stat. § 325F.69, subd. 1 (1998), and included a claim for attorney fees under the Private Remedies…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Lake County Grading Co. of Libertyville, Inc. v. Advance Mechanical Contractors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Brody v. Finch University of Health Sciences/the Chicago Medical SchoolAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by161 opinions
- Drobnak v. Andersen Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Transclean Corporation, James P. Viken, Jon A. Lang, and Donald E. Johnson v. Bridgewood Services, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Anitra D. Davis v. U.S. Bancorp, Doing Business as U.S. Bank National Association John Doe Mary Roe Persons UnknownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.