Legal Opinion
Dahlin v. Kroening
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 27, 2011No. A09-1800PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. BARRY, Justice.
The issue presented in this case is whether a judgment creditor, by bringing an action on a previously renewed judgment, may renew the judgment for an additional ten years pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 541.04 (2010). The district court concluded that section 541.04 limits an action on a judgment to one renewal and the court of appeals reversed. We affirm the court of appeals.
In 1988, respondent Linda Dahlin obtained a $7,000 judgment for unpaid spousal maintenance against appellant Randall Kroening. In 1998, the 1988 judgment was extended for an additional ten…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- SHAMROCK DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- Reiter v. KiffmeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- McIntosh County Bank v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLPSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In Re SitarzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Allen F. Grazer v. Gordon A. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- RDNT, LLC v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Lamere v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Corzo Trucking Corp. v. WestDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Gary E. Mitchell, John DoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.