Legal Opinion
Thiele v. Stich
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 1, 1988No. C1-87-645PublishedCited by 699 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Justice.
DeVee Thiele sued attorney Robert Stich in 1986 for legal malpractice in connection with her 1980 dissolution proceeding. Stich answered alleging insufficient service of process and Thiele re-served the summons and complaint. The trial court granted summary judgment for Stich on the ground that the six-year statute of limitations had run by the time of the second, proper service. The court of appeals reversed, holding the first service was ineffective, but the limitation period did not begin to run until 1986. Thiele v. Stich, 416 N.W.2d 827, 829-30 (Minn.App.1987). We agree…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Steve Benny v. Danny Pipes and Charles PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Jackson v. HayakawaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Hunt v. IBM Mid America Employees Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by699 opinions
- Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. WoltersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
694 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.