Legal Opinion

Biescar v. Czechoslovak-Patronat

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1956No. Civ. 21532PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

This is an appeal by the Czechoslovak-Patronat (hereinafter designated Patronat) from a judgment quieting title to real property in favor of plaintiffs and certain cross-complainants.

The plaintiffs who originally filed the within action for declaratory relief and to quiet title are heirs of Henry and Josephine Biescar, the grantors of the property here in dispute. Named as defendants were the Patronat and other heirs of the grantors. The defendant heirs, in turn, cross-complained against the Patronat, raising the same issues made in the complaint. The Patronat has also filed its own…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Knight v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Barnett v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Fitzgerald v. County of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Patterson v. DonnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Dam v. ZinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Willard v. First Church of Christ, ScientistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Briggs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1979
  3. Kraemer v. KraemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Seattle-First National Bank v. EarlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. Haskel Engineering & Supply Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API