Kraemer v. Kraemer
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
COUGHLIN, J. pro tern. *
This is an action to quiet title to 47.61 acres of land commonly referred to by the parties as the “Beservoir Site.” The primary issues presented on this appeal concern the effect of an allegedly ambiguous deed and the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a finding of adverse possession by a cotenant.
In 1881 Daniel Kraemer “granted and conveyed” to the Anaheim Water Company “the right and privilege” of using the 47.61 acres of land in question for reservoir purposes, including the right to do whatever was necessary to construct dams and store water thereon, together…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Kurt Hitke & Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Johns v. ScobieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Sorensen v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Horace Case v. Arthur E. MorrisetteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Willard v. First Church of Christ, ScientistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Warren v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Weller v. ChavarriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Alamo School District v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.