Fitzgerald v. County of Modoc
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
In its form this is a simple action to quiet title, brought against the county of Modoc and T. F. Dunaway, the complaint alleging title in plaintiff to nine acres of land in the county of Modoc, and asserting that the defendants set up some claim of right or title thereto. The county of Modoc disclaimed. Defendant Dunaway answered, alleging title in himself. The findings declare plaintiff to be the owner of the land, that Dunaway’s claim is without right, and judgment followed accordingly. Defendant Dunaway appeals.
By the evidence it appears that the action is in fact one to enforce a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cleary v. FolgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Quatman v. McCrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Parsons v. SmilieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Behlow v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Cunningham v. . ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Laux v. FreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Pinsky v. SloatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Walton v. City of Red BluffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Parks v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- King County v. Hanson Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.