Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Barnett

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1894No. 18303PublishedCited by 45 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. , The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

March 14, 1890, B. B. Barnett executed to the plaintiff herein a deed of conveyance of certain lands in Fresno county, by which he purported to “give, grant, alien, and confirm unto the said party of the second part and to his heirs (and assigns forever) all those certain lots, pieces, or parcels of land .... to have and to hold, all and singular, the said premises, together with the appurtenances, unto the said party of the second part (heirs and assigns forever) for and during his natural life, and to the issue arid heirs of the body of the said party of the second part.” The instrument was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bodine's Adm'rs v. ArthurCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
  2. Faivre v. DaleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Henderson v. MackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1884
  4. Pellissier v. CorkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Montgomery v. SturdivantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Gray v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Willard v. First Church of Christ, ScientistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Utter v. SidmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  5. Burnett v. PiercyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API