Legal Opinion

Dam v. Zink

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1896No. 1625PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yuba County. E. A. Davis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This is an appeal by Elizabeth Zinlc, defendant, upon the judgment-roll, which includes findings, from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, in an action to quiet' title to a tract of land in Yuba county. The only question raised is as to the sufficiency of the findings to support the judgment.

In the complaint, after the usual averments of ownership of the land by plaintiff, it is averred that the defendants (of whom there were several) claim some interest in the land, but that said claim was without any right, and further that the defendants Elizabeth Zink and Jacob Zink “claim to hold a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Carey v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Daly v. SoroccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Frazier v. CrowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. LaMar v. LaMarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Garrison v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Hitchcock v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Turner v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API