Legal Opinion

Seattle-First National Bank v. Earl

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 21, 1977No. 1360-3PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Munson C.J.

What effect is to be given a rental escalation clause contained in a long-term lease where the index necessary to effectuate the escalation is nonexistent? The trial court held that the escalation clause was without effect and the trial court could not rewrite an unambiguous contract, except to the extent that the parties' subsequent conduct evidenced an agreement to escalate the rent an additional $52.50 per month. The Seattle-First National Bank, as trustee and lessor, appeals from this judgment. We find the nonexistence of the index upon which the parties agreed causes the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grant County Constructors v. E. v. Lane Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Finch v. CarltonWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Friedland v. City of HollywoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. Stahl v. SchwartzWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. ShulmanWashington Supreme Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Condon v. CondonWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Barnes v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  3. Mabey v. Kay Peterson Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Johnston v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of JoplinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. In Re the Marriage of MudgettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API