Legal Opinion

Knight v. Black

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1912No. Civ. No. 1010PublishedCited by 53 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. E. P. Mogan, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

Respondent had judgment in the lower court as the plaintiff in an action in unlawful detainer. The defendant, Henry Black, has appealed from the judgment and from an order denying him a new trial. The points presented upon the appeal relate mainly to the overruling of the defendants’ demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint, the sustaining of the plaintiff’s demurrer to the defendants’ cross-complaint, and the granting of plaintiff’s motion to strike out parts of the defendants’ answer.

The plaintiff’s cause of action is founded substantially upon the following facts:

On November 23, 1908,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ralph v. LomerWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Abrams v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Kew v. TrainorIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Phillips v. Port Townsend Lodge, No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Lundin v. SchoeffelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Schweiger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Tide Water Associated Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API