Haskel Engineering & Supply Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
This appeal from a summary judgment in declaratory relief raises an issue apparently not previously considered in California, We are required to determine whether, where the obligor on a fidelity bond has fully reimbursed its obligee for loss caused by the embezzlement of an employee, the obligor or the obligee is entitled to increases in value of property acquired by the employee with the embezzled funds. Recognizing that the equitable principles of constructive trust and subrogation collide when applied to the issue, we conclude that the obligor is entitled to the benefit…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Meadows v. BierschwaleTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- United States Leasing Corp. v. duPontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Kristovich v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Brunswick Corp. v. HaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Biescar v. Czechoslovak-PatronatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re National Mortgage Equity Corp. Mortgage Pool Certificates Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1986
- Coppinger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Heckmann v. AhmansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Gladstone v. HillelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Fidelity National Title Insurance v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.