Legal Opinion
Township of Honner v. Redwood County
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 28, 1994No. C8-94-659PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
ANDERSON, Chief Judge.
FACTS
Respondents Larry Okins, et al. petitioned respondent Board of Commissioners of Redwood County (the county board) to change the boundaries of appellant Honner Township (the township) pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 379.02 (1992). After a public hearing, the county board granted the petition in a written decision dated May 4,1993. On June 30, 1993, the township petitioned the district court for a writ of certiorari to review the county board’s action. In an order filed February 28,1994, the district court affirmed the county board’s decision.
The township…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- White Bear Rod and Gun Club v. City of HugoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Strand v. Special School District No. 1Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Amdahl v. County of FillmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Roseville Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 623Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Minneapolis Community Development AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Neitzel v. County of RedwoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Heideman v. Metropolitan Airports CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Shetka v. Aitkin CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Welch v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.