Legal Opinion
Strand v. Special School District No. 1
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 5, 1986No. C4-84-1466PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
Projected decreases in enrollment and funding prompted Special School District No. 1 for the City of Minneapolis to reduce its teaching staff for the 1984-85 school year by 401 teachers. Respondents Arlene Strand and Barbara Johnson, two of the 72 non-probationary teachers whose services were terminated, appealed to the court of appeals, which reversed, ruling that both terminations were improper. Strand v. Special School District No. 1, 361 N.W.2d 69 (Minn.App.1984). We affirm the decision of the court of appeals with respect to Strand as modified herein and reverse with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- Cretex Companies, Inc. v. Construction Leaders, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Welsko v. Foster Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Schmidt v. Independent School District No. 1, AitkinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Berland v. Special School District No. 1, MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Harms v. Independent School District No. 300Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Butler v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- Township of Honner v. Redwood CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Fredrich v. Independent School District No. 720Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.