Legal Opinion
Heideman v. Metropolitan Airports Commission
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 12, 1996No. C7-96-1662PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
FACTS
Relator Kathy D. Heideman was discharged from her employment with respondent Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). MAC affirmed Heideman’s termination on July 15,1996. Heideman filed this certiorari appeal on August 13,1996.
Heideman moves for a determination of whether this court or the district court has jurisdiction, indicating that she has obtained writs of certiorari in both courts. MAC takes the position that this court has certio-rari jurisdiction.
DECISION
“In the absence of an adequate method of review or legal remedy, judicial review of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- White Bear Rod and Gun Club v. City of HugoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Township of Honner v. Redwood CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'N OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLISSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- City of Minneapolis v. MeldahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Mowry v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- City of Hibbing v. BarattoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Lam v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. TokheimCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.