Shetka v. Aitkin County
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
As directed by the Aitkin County Shore-land Management Ordinance, appellant George Shetka sought review of the Aitkin County planning commission’s denial of his conditional use permit application first by the county board and then by the district court. The district court dismissed Shetka’s complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, stating that a writ of certiorari was the only available method to obtain judicial review pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 394.27, subd. 2. When the district court issued its decision, however, the time for Shetka to obtain a writ of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Mesaba Aviation Division of Halvorson of Duluth, Inc. v. County of ItascaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Earthburners, Inc. v. County of CarltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Township of Honner v. Redwood CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Neitzel v. County of RedwoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Minneapolis Community Development AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Molnar v. County of Carver Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Toby's of Alexandria, Inc. v. County of DouglasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- CEMETERY v. City of RosevilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- University of Minnesota v. WoolleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.