Legal Opinion
Amdahl v. County of Fillmore
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 30, 1977No. 47146 to 47149PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGOSHESKE, Justice.
In January 1976, the Fillmore County Board of Commissioners voted to raise in varying amounts the salaries of the county sheriff, auditor, treasurer, and county recorder. 1 The board also set the budgets for all offices except that of the sheriff, approval of which was still pending. Thereafter, separate statutory appeals to the district court were instituted by the officers on the grounds that their raises were arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable, and made without sufficient regard to their duties and responsibilities. With the exception of the sheriff, each of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Steenerson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- State v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Busse v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS, SIBLEYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Tihonovich v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- Township of Honner v. Redwood CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Neighborhood School Coalition v. Independent School District No. 279Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.