Legal Opinion
Neitzel v. County of Redwood
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 6, 1994No. C4-94-44PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
The Redwood County Board of Commissioners denied appellants’ application for a conditional use permit. Appellants sought review of the board’s decision in the district court. The- district court affirmed the board’s decision. This appeal is from the judgment of the district court.
FACTS
Appellants Charles Neitzel, Gregory Green, and Robert Melhouse applied for a conditional use permit to construct and operate an animal feedlot in Redwood County. The Redwood County Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the permit subject to twelve conditions. After meeting…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Oakman v. City of EvelethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Norris Grain Co. v. Seafarers' International Union of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Minneapolis Community Development AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Molnar v. County of Carver Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Manteuffel v. City of North St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Shetka v. Aitkin CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Veit Co. v. Lake CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.