Legal Opinion
Dietz v. Dodge County
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 31, 1992No. C9-91-73PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
On petition of Dodge County and its board of commissioners, we consider only the question of whether, consistent with the policies announced in our decision in Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11, 459 N.W.2d 671 (Minn.1990), a petition for a writ of certiorari provides the exclusive means by which an employee can secure judicial review of the county’s employment termination decision. The court of appeals held that the employee was not limited to the review afforded on certiorari, allowing thereby the maintenance by Charlotte Dietz of her action for wrongful termination.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- State ex rel. Hart v. Common CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Sellin v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- State Ex Rel. McGinnis v. Police Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Joel Charchenko v. City of StillwaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- David J. BECHTOLD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF ROSEMOUNT, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Marriage of Holmberg v. HolmbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Navarre v. South Washington County SchoolsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Willis v. County of SherburneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.