Legal Opinion

Moresco v. Foppiano

California Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1936No. Sac. 5008PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSbenk, J.

The plaintiff sued to recover from the defendants certain sums paid under an oral contract for the purchase and sale of real property alleged to have been breached by the defendants, and other moneys expended for permanent improvements on the property. The plaintiff also sought to foreclose the purchaser’s lien provided by section 3050 of the Civil Code. The defendants filed an answer, and defendant Foppiano, the owner of the real property, filed a cross-complaint praying for specific performance of the contract. The court found that the defendant G-ianelli acted solely as agent for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Hunt v. L. M. Field, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Promis v. DukeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Chatfield v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Dickey v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Orella v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Ballagh v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Cole v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1948
  5. Collins v. WolfDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API