Hunt v. L. M. Field, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment rescinding and canceling a written contract. On \ February 28, 1922, and at divers times thereafter, the agents of the appellant company are alleged to have represented to i the respondent, among other things, that said company had ' \ for sale a certain motor-truck and trailer; that said vehicles | were in good mechanical condition and available for imme- : diate delivery; that they carried with them a manufacturer’s \ warranty as to their proper construction and freedom from mechanical imperfection; and that the purchaser of said…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matteson v. WagonerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Blanc v. ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Menefee v. OxnamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Davis v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Newman v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Ferguson v. KochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Williams v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Vogelsang v. WolpertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.