Legal Opinion

Ballagh v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 17, 1942No. Civ. 12760PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRAPEAU, J. pro tem.

— Four men became interested in a placer mine on the Mother Lode. In a placer mine gold is mixed in with sand and gravel, generally a deposit in the stream bed of a living or an ancient river. If there is gold enough in the gravel to pay the cost of extracting it, and something more for the miner, it is said to be a paying proposition. If there is enormous profit for the miner, it is said to be a bonanza. But, if there is no profit, or not enough profit to pay the cost of operation, then it is said to be borrasca. In this case, and with reference to this particular…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wolpert v. GriptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Sanders v. MagillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. McMahon v. GrimesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Schomer v. R. L. Craig Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Alexander v. State Capital Co.California Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Johndrow v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association and Robert G. Litolff v. William HaydenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  4. Berg v. HoganNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. OyamaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API