Legal Opinion

Chatfield v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1890No. 13541PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of Butte County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

It is alleged in the complaint that plaintiff and defendants entered into an agreement of which the following is a copy:—

"Biggs, Cal., March 29, 1888.
"Received from C. E. Chatfield three hundred dollars, for which McDaniel & Co. agree to cause to be conveyed, by bargain and sale deed, to said C. E. Chatfield, the following land in Butte County, California,'shown on the plat of Pitt’s addition, and upon the terms following, to wit: Lot Eo. one (1), containing 4.45 acres, in said Pitt’s addition to the town site of Biggs, as per map on file with the recorder of Butte County, payable at Biggs,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gillet v. MaynardNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  2. Farmers' Natl. Gold Bank v. StoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Frost v. SmithThe Superior Court of New York City · 1860

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Pacific Beach Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. San Diego Construction Co. v. MannixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Smith v. JaccardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  4. Moss Estate Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Burns v. ScooffyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API