Legal Opinion
Cole v. Loew's Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 30, 1948No. 8005PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion.
YANKWICH, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The Court will adopt, as his own, the findings of the jury returned on the special verdict contained in the answers to the four questions propounded, and, on the basis of those answers and the findings which are implicit in the answers1, the Court will *521make the following findings and declarations :
I. The Jury’s Verdict and its Implications.
The Court finds that the notice of December 2, 1947, given by Loew’s Incorporated, suspending the employment of the plaintiff, Lester Cole, for the reasons therein indicated, is null and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- May v. New York Motion Picture Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BettencourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Goudal v. Cecil B. DeMille Pictures Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Kiker v. Bank Sav. Life Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
- Moresco v. FoppianoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Loew's, Inc. v. ColeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Utah State Farm Bureau Federation v. National Farmers Union Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- John Robert Lucas v. Whittaker Corporation, a California Corporation, and Whittaker Power Systems Corporation, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. WIYN Radio, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1978
- Hershman v. Full Spectrum Laser LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.