Legal Opinion

Dickey v. Dunn

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 1927No. Docket No. 5209PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.

An appeal from a judgment rescinding an assignment of a contract for the sale of real property executed by appellant Dunn, and a conveyance of like property by plaintiff Zimmerman. Subsequent to the taking of the appeal Zimmerman died and Elizabeth W. Z. Dickey, as administratrix of his estate, was substituted as respondent therein. The appeal is presented on the judgment-roll with a bill of exceptions, specifying as grounds for reversal an insufficiency of evidence to sustain the findings and rulings by the court in admitting and rejecting certain testimony.

It appears without conflict that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Cent. Pac. R.R. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Teague v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. In Re Estate of RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. City of Los Angeles v. DeaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. McMahon v. GrimesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Gammon v. Ealey & ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Powell v. Oak Ridge Orchards Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API