Legal Opinion
Trend Homes, Inc. v. Central Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 9, 1990No. F010584PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRANSON, P. J.
Statement of the Case
Trend Homes, Inc. (Trend), and Land Dynamics appeal the judgment dismissing their first amended complaint against Central Unified School District (CUSD) and James R. Henderson, the director of business and financial services for CUSD. By their complaint, appellants sought declaratory relief and restitution of school facilities fees paid to CUSD as a condition of the approval of appellants’ residential developments. Appellants alleged that these fees were invalid under California Constitution, articles XIII A and XIII B. Specifically, the first cause…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Candid Enterprises, Inc. v. Grossmont Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Fundin v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Pfeiffer v. City of La MesaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- County of Placer v. CorinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- SUTCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. Modesto High School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Stockton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Dinuba v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Barratt American, Inc. v. City of Rancho CucamongaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- N.T. Hill Inc. v. City of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.