Legal Opinion
City of Dinuba v. County of Tulare
California Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 2007No. S143326PublishedCited by 147 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORENO, J.
Counties are statutorily required to collect property taxes on behalf of local taxing entities and then allocate and distribute the revenue to these entities pursuant to a complex statutory scheme. (Rev. & Tax. Code, § 95 et seq.; Health & Saf. Code, § 33000 et seq.) The County of Tulare (County) improperly computed the portion of tax revenue to which the City of Dinuba Redevelopment Agency (Agency) was statutorily entitled and Agency now seeks to recover the misallocated revenue.
We granted review to consider whether County is immune from suit under Government Code section…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn.California Supreme Court · 1972
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Santa Clara County Counsel Attorneys Ass'n v. WoodsideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by147 opinions
- Loeffler v. Target CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Lueras v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Klein v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- West v. JPMorgan Chase BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.