Legal Opinion
SUTCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. Modesto High School Dist.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 22, 1989No. F009783PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEST, Acting P. J.
Appellants Modesto High School District, Modesto City School District, Empire Union School District and Stanislaus Union School District (Districts or appellants) appeal from a peremptory writ of mandate in favor of respondents Sutco Construction Company, Inc. (Sutco), Steven Paul Zagaris Development Company (Zagaris), and Vintage Faire Development Company, Inc. (Vintage Faire), (Developers), commanding the school districts to set aside prior impositions of school facility fees and refund all fees collected from respondents Sutco and Zagaris, and to cease further…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Merrill v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re AlpineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Bialo v. Western Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Department of Fish & Game v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Scott v. CIBA Vision Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- O'Connor v. Old Republic Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Herman v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.