Candid Enterprises, Inc. v. Grossmont Union High School District
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
The major question we must decide in this case concerns what are commonly referred to as “school-impact fees”—i.e., fees that local governments impose on real property development to cover the costs of constructing and maintaining school facilities attributable to such development. The precise question is whether the School Facilities Act (sometimes hereafter the Act) (Gov. Code, § 65970 et seq.) 1 —which encourages local school boards to identify and local governments to deal with the problem of overcrowding, and to that end permits the imposition of school-impact fees to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Action Apartment Ass'n v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- City of Sacramento v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.