Legal Opinion
Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 22, 2000No. B130247PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, P. J.
Appellant Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association (hereinafter, the Association) brought a taxpayer suit challenging the Home Occupations Ordinance (L.A. Ord. No. 171427) (hereinafter, the Ordinance). The Association alleged that the Ordinance, enacted by respondent City of Los Angeles (hereinafter, the City), extended the City’s business tax to persons engaged in home occupations in the City who previously were not required to pay the tax, and created an annual $25 registration fee (later rescinded) for persons engaged in home occupations. The Association urges that both the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Bronco Wine Co. v. Frank A. Logoluso FarmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Volkswagen Pacific, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People Ex Rel. Dept. of Conservation v. TriplettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McWilliams v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Batt v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Ardon v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- County of Sonoma v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.