Legal Opinion
Fundin v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 22, 1984No. Civ. 29342PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDANIEL, J.
This is an appeal from a minute order sustaining defendant Chicago Pneumatic Tool Company’s demurrer without leave to amend. The appeal should have been taken from the judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to the minute order. We construe the appeal to have been taken from the judgment (Zappas v. King Williams Press, Inc. (1970) 10 Cal.App.3d 768, 770, fn. 1 [89 Cal.Rptr. 307]) and address the case on its merits.
Facts
Lyle Fundin (plaintiff) operated a well-drilling business. He entered into negotiations with Shepherd Machinery Company (Shepherd) and Chicago Pneumatic Tool…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Peterson v. Lamb Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1960
- Nichols v. Canoga IndustriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Sunset Milling & Grain Co. v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Becker v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Consolidated Generator-Nevada, Inc. v. Cummins Engine Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Collins Co. v. Carboline Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Keith v. BuchananCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Appalachian Insurance v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Wolfe v. State Farm Fire & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.