Legal Opinion
N.T. Hill Inc. v. City of Fresno
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 7, 1999No. F027142PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DIBIASO, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff N.T. Hill Inc., doing business as R. J. Hill Company (Hill), appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant City of Fresno (City) in a lawsuit brought by Hill to challenge the legality of certain water capacity fees assessed against a residential subdivision being developed by Hill. We will reverse. In the published portion of this opinion we compare Government Code sections 66020 and 66022 and describe their respective applications with respect to fees of the type in issue.
Statement of Case and Facts
In June 1994, Hill submitted a vesting tentative…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Ehrlich v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Santa Monica v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Travis v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Utility Cost Management v. Indian Wells Valley Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- El Dorado Palm Springs, Ltd. v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Utility Cost Management v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.