Legal Opinion

Pfeiffer v. City of La Mesa

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 15, 1977No. Civ. 14633PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AULT, J. *

Assuming a municipality imposes invalid conditions in a building permit, this case presents the issue of whether a landowner can comply with a condition “under protest,” construct the required improvement, and then maintain an action in inverse condemnation to recover his costs. We conclude, as did the trial judge, he cannot, and that the proper method to test the validity of conditions in a building permit is a proceeding in mandamus under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5.

Plaintiffs Pfeiffer, the owners of improved real property located in the City of La Mesa, appeal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Gill v. Curtis Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Scrutton v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Gabaldon v. United Farm Workers Organizing CommitteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. San Remo Hotel L.P. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Shapell Industries, Inc. v. Governing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API