Megowan v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The plaintiffs filed separate actions for damages for injuries to person and property against the City of Los Angeles and M. E. Meador caused by a collision between a city-owned car operated by the defendant Meador and a car operated by the plaintiff Megowan, with whom the plaintiff Onstad was riding. Judgments were entered in favor of the plaintiffs against both defendants. The defendant Meador has not appealed. The appeal of the defendant city is presented on a consolidated record.
The collision occurred between 7 :40 and 8 o’clock on Saturday morning, December 23, 1933, at the intersection…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bushnell v. Yoshika TashiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Brindamour v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Keeney v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by5 opinions
- Peccolo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Shields v. Oxnard Harbor DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Henriksen v. City of RialtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Henriksen v. City of RialtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Henriksen v. City of RialtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993