Legal Opinion

Bushnell v. Yoshika Tashiro

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1931No. Docket No. 7166PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

While walking across a street in San Francisco, plaintiff was struck and injured by a Ford delivery truck owned by the defendant Peoples Laundry Company and driven by its employee and co-defendant Tashiro; and subsequently he brought this, action for damages against the owner and the driver, claiming that the accident was caused by the driver’s negligence. Upon trial a jury ren dered a verdict against both defendants for the sum of $6,500, and from the judgment entered thereon Peoples Laundry Company prosecutes this appeal. The accident occurred on a Sunday evening about 6 o’clock on Folsom…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Mar Shee v. Maryland Assurance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Randolph v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Brown v. Chevrolet Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Barsha v. Metro-Goldwyn-MayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API